Emmett Irr. Dist. v. Thompson
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Second Division of the District of Idaho; Frank S. Dietrich, Judge. Suit in equity by J. Paul Thompson and others against the Emmett Irrigation District and others. Decree for complainants, and defendants appeal.
1Opinion of the Court
ROSS, Circuit Judge,
The bonds here in suit are a part of an authorized issue of $1,100,000, par value, made by the appellant irriga*317lion district, and, except as to numbers, amounts, and dates of maturity, are identical. Each is a coupon bond, negotiable in form, and made payable to bearer, and recites upon its face, among other things, that it is one of a series of bonds aggregating $1,100,000 in amount and issued by the district by authority of an act of the Legislature of the state of Idaho entitled “An act relating to irrigation districts and to provide for the organization thereof, and to…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Twin Falls Salmon River Land & Water Co. v. CaldwellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1917
- Thompson v. Emmett Irr. Dist.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1915
- Wright v. East Riverside Irr. Dist.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1905
- Emmett Irrigation District v. ShaneIdaho Supreme Court · 1911
- Page v. Oneida Irrigation DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1914
3Cited by4 opinions
- Payette Lakes Protective Ass'n v. Lake Reservoir Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1948
- Turner v. Roseberry Irrigation DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1921
- In re Western Gear Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1931
- Emmett Irr. Dist. v. SeymourCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1921