Streff v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
McCLOUD, Chief Justice.
The jury found appellant guilty of the felony offense of driving while intoxicated; and the court assessed punishment at confinement for three years, which was probated, and a fine of $1,000. We affirm.
In her first point of error, appellant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence because of a variance between the sequence of prior offenses as alleged in the indictment and the evidence at trial. Appellant argues that the indictment and the court’s charge required the State to prove the prior offenses as sequential.
The indictment alleged that, prior to…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Harris v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
- Lankston v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
- Stone v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1992
- Meraz v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Gibson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999
- Price v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1995
- Clay v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2003
- Lee Joseph v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2012
- Mares v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)1995
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.