Commonwealth, Department of Revenue v. Majestic Collieries Co.
Kentucky Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
LUKOWSKY, Justice.
The issue presented is whether the lessees of coal interests, who had contract miners extract coal from the leasehold for them were the taxpayers engaged in severing coal who should have paid the coal severance tax. The Board of Tax Appeals said yes. The Circuit Court said no. We granted a joint request for transfer from the Court of Appeals. We reverse.
The facts are not in dispute. Majestic Collieries Company and Sovereign Coal Corporation are lessees of coal bearing properties having the right to remove and sell the coal and the duty to pay royalties to the lessor. These…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Locust Coal Company v. BennettCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1959
- Clay County v. Leslie CountyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1975
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. Rapoca Energy Co.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 1985
- Cimmaron Coal Corp. v. Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1984
- State v. MyersMissouri Court of Appeals · 2012
- State v. Burgess Mining & Construction Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1984