Legal Opinion

Hewett v. Riley

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided November 4, 1947No. 3682PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBlandin, J.

Upon analysis it appears that the fundamental contentions of the plaintiff in this proceeding are two. First, that the evidence as a matter of law is insufficient to sustain the Appeal Tribunal’s finding that the plaintiff voluntarily terminated his employment without good cause attributable to his employer. Second, that the Appeal Tribunal’s decision amounted to a ruling of law that an “employer’s request that an employee participate in perjurous acts was not unreasonable, and that in such a situation the employee must perform the perjury and only if ‘any ensuing difficulties’ arise might he…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cloutier v. State Milk Control BoardSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1942
  2. Nawn v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1914
  3. Goldsmith v. KingsfordSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1943
  4. Ricard v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1934

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Appeal of T & M Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API