Legal Opinion
Chester v. Quadco Rehabilitation Center
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided April 20, 2007No. 3:06 CV 7075PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
ZOUHARY, District Judge.
Plaintiff brings suit under the Family and Medical Leave Act, 29 U.S.C. § 2601 et seq. (FMLA). Specifically, Plaintiff claims Defendants interfered with, restrained and denied the exercise of his FMLA rights, and Defendants terminated him in retaliation for his attempt to exercise such rights. The Court has jurisdiction over these claims pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331 and 29 U.S.C. § 2617(a)(2). This matter is before the Court on Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 55). Defendants’ Motion is denied.
Facts
Plaintiff worked for…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Ragsdale v. Wolverine World Wide, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Tom PIERCE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COMMONWEALTH LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY and Capital Holding Corporation, Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Allen v. City of SturgisDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2008
- Kendrick v. Worldwide Equipment, Inc.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2022
- Muhammad-Smith v. Psychiatric Solutions, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2012