Legal Opinion

Curtis v. Wilkins

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 15, 1957No. 49187PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWennerstrum, J.

-Plaintiff sought judgment against the defendant claiming the sum of $357 was due him for digging a well. The case was tried to the court, neither party having asked for a jury. Plaintiff’s petition was in two counts. In the first one it was alleged there was an express contract for digging a well 102 feet deep, and in which the sum of $357 was claimed. Count two of plaintiff’s petition alleged the plaintiff performed services at defendant’s request which were reasonably worth the sum of $357. At the conclusion of plaintiff’s evidence the defendant made a motion to dismiss count two of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Eaves v. City of OttumwaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1949
  2. Maasdam v. Estate of MaasdamSupreme Court of Iowa · 1946
  3. Davis v. KnightSupreme Court of Iowa · 1948
  4. Staley v. Fazel Bros. Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1956
  5. Isaacs v. BruceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1934

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Rolfing v. HarveySupreme Court of Iowa · 1960
  2. In Re Lawrence's EstateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1960
  3. Gaskill v. GahmanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1963
  4. Brown Manufacturing Company v. CrouseSupreme Court of Iowa · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API