Curtis v. Wilkins
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the CourtWennerstrum, J.
-Plaintiff sought judgment against the defendant claiming the sum of $357 was due him for digging a well. The case was tried to the court, neither party having asked for a jury. Plaintiff’s petition was in two counts. In the first one it was alleged there was an express contract for digging a well 102 feet deep, and in which the sum of $357 was claimed. Count two of plaintiff’s petition alleged the plaintiff performed services at defendant’s request which were reasonably worth the sum of $357. At the conclusion of plaintiff’s evidence the defendant made a motion to dismiss count two of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Eaves v. City of OttumwaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1949
- Maasdam v. Estate of MaasdamSupreme Court of Iowa · 1946
- Davis v. KnightSupreme Court of Iowa · 1948
- Staley v. Fazel Bros. Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1956
- Isaacs v. BruceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1934
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Rolfing v. HarveySupreme Court of Iowa · 1960
- In Re Lawrence's EstateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1960
- Gaskill v. GahmanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1963
- Brown Manufacturing Company v. CrouseSupreme Court of Iowa · 1960