Legal Opinion

Jordan v. Duckett

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided October 11, 1934No. 10340PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGilbert, J.

Gresham Duckett, claiming title to described land, filed a petition in which he alleged that C. J. Jordan was wrongfully in possession thereof and was wrongfully cutting timber off of a described portion. The bill of exceptions contains a demurrer to the petition, and recites that “none of the evidence in said case is material to a. clear understanding, or to elucidate the errors complained of in this bill of exceptions.” The only judgment rendered, as shown by the record, is: “It is considered, ordered, and adjudged that the prayers of the plaintiff'for a restraining order be granted. And…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hawkins v. Mayor of AmericusSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
  2. Cady v. CadySupreme Court of Georgia · 1926
  3. Federal Investment Co. v. EwingSupreme Court of Georgia · 1927
  4. Love v. LoveSupreme Court of Georgia · 1916
  5. Town of Fairburn v. EdmondsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1925

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Jones v. PierceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1941
  2. Borden v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API