Legal Opinion

Robinson v. City of Oconto

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 31, 1913PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the circuit court for Oconto county: S. D. Hastings, Circuit Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtBaenes, J.

This action was brought to recover damages for an injury received from a fall on an alleged defective sidewalk. The plaintiff recovered judgment and defendant appeals.

The appellant contends (1) that it was guilty of no actionable negligence; (2) that on the undisputed evidence the plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence; (3) that the court erred in ruling on the admission of evidence; (4) that the court erred in charging the jury; and (5) that the damages are excessive.

1. It is urged that a city may adopt a plan for public improvements and that it is not liable for damages resulting…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lyon v. City of Grand RapidsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Collins v. City of JanesvilleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Zoellner v. City of Fond du LacWisconsin Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Duncan v. City of Grand RapidsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Madison v. City of AntigoWisconsin Supreme Court · 1913

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. City of Birmingham v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1918
  2. Estate of JavornikWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Shequin v. ShequinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Wilke v. Milwaukee Electric Railway & Light Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Jones v. City of ColumbusCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1943

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API