Legal Opinion · Concurrence

State v. Estlick

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 20, 1974Published

1Concurrence

TONGUE, J.,

specially concurring.

I agree with the result of the majority opinion, but would reach that result for somewhat different reasons.

Defendant, a claim adjuster for an insurance company, was charged with the crime of obtaining money *82by false pretenses. The conviction of the defendant, after a jury trial, was affirmed by the Court of Appeals, 14 Or App 288, 511 P2d 1250 (1973). Defendant has petitioned for a review of that decision.

The indictment charged that defendant, together with Evans Smith (who operated a construction company), and two of Smith’s relatives (who owned a home),…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. People v. FleishMichigan Supreme Court · 1948
  2. State v. FoxNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
  3. Arthur v. ParishOregon Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Commonwealth v. GarrisonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  5. Simmons v. HOLMOregon Supreme Court · 1961

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API