Legal Opinion
Shivell v. Hurd
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 16, 1953No. Civ. No. 19208PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PATROSSO, J. pro tem.
Plaintiffs in 1940 obtained a judgment against defendants in the sum of $1,250. In March, 1950, plaintiffs moved the court for a writ of execution upon this judgment pursuant to the provisions of section 685, Code of Civil Procedure, which motion was granted and an order was entered directing that such writ issue. From this order, an appeal is taken by the defendants resulting in an affirmance thereof by this court (Shivell v. Hurd, 104 Cal.App.2d 291 [231 P.2d 595]). Following the filing of the remittitur in the superior court a writ of execution was issued *406and levied…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Johnson v. CollierSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Thatcher v. RockwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Griffin v. Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- Reed v. PaulMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1881
- Herring v. DowningMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Kaley v. Catalina YachtsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Shivell v. HurdCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Shivell v. HurdCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Bowles v. Pacific Commissary Co.California Court of Appeal · 1962