Davidowitz v. Philadelphia County
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Me. Chief Justice Kephart,
This proceeding on original jurisdiction challenges the use of voting machines in the coming election. These machines expedite the count, are helpful in reducing the possibility of election frauds, and their employment should be encouraged. They have been installed in the various counties at great expense and by vote of a majority of the electors thereof. A court, therefore, should not restrain their use unless a legislative or constitutional provision is clearly violated. However, the legislature evidently foresaw that contingencies might arise where…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- O'Neil v. Am. Fire Ins.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895
- Whitney v. City of PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1891
- Matter of Crane v. VoorhisNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
- McFadden's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
- Matter of Callaghan v. VoorhisNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- City of St. Louis v. CroweSupreme Court of Missouri · 1964
- Resnick v. BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ELECTIONS OF BALTIMORE CITYCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966
- Automatic Voting Machine Corp. v. Witkin, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1948
- Henry v. PechinDelaware County Court of Quarter Sessions · 1938
- In re Mistake in Printing of Ballots, 1946 General Election, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Berks County1946
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.