Legal Opinion
Tennessee Protection & Advocacy, Inc. v. Board of Education of Putnam County
District Court, M.D. Tennessee
Decided October 20, 1998No. 2-98-0036PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
WISEMAN, Senior District Judge.
Before the Court is defendant’s motion to dismiss complaint for (1) lack of standing, (2) failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, and (3) failure to exhaust administrative remedies. Also before the Court are plaintiffs motion to amend complaint and supplemental brief in opposition to the motion to dismiss, and defendant’s responsive motion to strike pleadings. For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS defendant’s motion to dismiss on the basis of lack of standing. The Court has considered plaintiffs proposed amended complaint…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Bennett v. SpearSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Bender v. Williamsport Area School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Missouri Protection & Advocacy Services, Inc. v. CarnahanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007
- Brown v. StoneDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1999
- Goleta National Bank v. O'DONNELLDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2002
- Pennsylvania Protection & Advocacy, Inc. v. HoustonDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2001
- Risinger Ex Rel. Risinger v. ConcannonDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2000
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.