Legal Opinion

Goleta National Bank v. O'DONNELL

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided December 18, 2002No. C2-01-971PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM & ORDER

HOLSCHUH, District Judge.

Goleta National Bank (“Goleta”) brought suit against F. Scott O’Donnell, Superintendent of Financial Institutions of the Ohio Department of Commerce (“O’Donnell”), seeking to enjoin him from pursuing a regulatory action against ACE Cash Express, Inc. (“ACE”), an Ohio corporation. Goleta and ACE have entered into a contract whereby ACE purportedly acts as Goleta’s agent in making loans to Ohio consumers. O’Donnell is seeking to enforce the Ohio Small Loan Act (“OSLA”) against ACE, but Goleta claims that the National Bank Act (“NBA”) preempts his…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Cherry Hill Vineyards, LLC v. HudginsDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2006
  2. Bankwest, Inc. v. BakerDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2004
  3. West Virginia v. CashCall, Inc.District Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2009
  4. Ubaldi v. SLM Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2012
  5. Office of the Comptroller of the Currency v. SpitzerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API