Legal Opinion

Smith v. Kates

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 26, 1976No. Nos. 75-17 and 76-82PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Per curiam

Neither complaint filed herein complies with the procedural requirements of Gov. R. V.

Gov. R. V(4) provides that “* * * all proceedings with regard to * * * complaints and grievances involving alleged misconduct by attorneys and counselors at law and judges * * * shall be brought, conducted and disposed of in accordance with the provisions of this rule.”

Gov. R. V(8) requires that a disciplinary proceeding be initiated by the filing of a complaint with the Secretary of the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline, “Such complaint shall not be accepted for filing unless it is signed…

2Cited by16 opinions

  1. Mentor Lagoons, Inc. v. RubinOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Hecht v. LevinOhio Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Spivey v. BenderOhio Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. Shimko v. LobeOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Melling v. StralkaOhio Supreme Court · 1984

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API