Legal Opinion
Pitchford v. Oakwood Mobile Homes, Inc.
District Court, W.D. Virginia
Decided November 13, 2000No. Civil Action 5:99CV00053PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
MICHAEL, Senior District Judge.
Before the court is a motion by the defendants to compel arbitration and stay proceedings in the above-captioned civil action, pursuant to an arbitration agreement between the parties. The matter was referred to the presiding United States Magistrate Judge, B. Waugh Cri-gler, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) for recommended findings of fact and a proposed disposition. The Magistrate recommended that the court deny the defendants’ motion to compel. Both parties filed timely objections to the Report and Recommendation and the court shall make…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Volt Info. Sciences, Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jr. U.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. v. ByrdSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Thomas E. Walton Le'ellen Walton v. Rose Mobile Homes Llc, Southern Energy Homes, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
- Parkerson v. SmithMississippi Supreme Court · 2002
- Koons Ford of Baltimore, Inc. v. LobachCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
- Browne v. Kline Tysons Imports, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2002
- Patel v. BarotDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2014
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.