Harrold v. Fuenfstueck
Indiana Court of Appeals
From Laporte Superior Court; H. B. Tuthill, Judge. Action by Minnie Fuenfstueck against John Harrold. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtBlack, J.
This was an action brought by the appellee against the appellant to recover for board and lodging furnished and washing done by the former for the latter for a period of a number of years.
It~is assigned here that the court erred in overruling the appellant’s motion for a new trial. The recital of evidence in appellant’s brief shows a conflict upon the material facts, such that the verdict can not be disturbed on the grounds stated in the motion for a new trial — that it is not sustained by sufficient evidence, and that it is contrary to law.
*276Counsel for the appellant assert in their brief that…
2Cited by10 opinions
- Huber Manufacturing Co. v. BlessingIndiana Court of Appeals · 1912
- Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. SnowIndiana Court of Appeals · 1905
- Henderson v. HendersonIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
- Inland Steel Co. v. SmithIndiana Court of Appeals · 1905
- Fast v. JudyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1925
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.