Legal Opinion
Thurman v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided August 19, 2003No. 49A02-0211-CR-946PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SULLIVAN, Judge.
Appellant, Christopher Thurman, challenges the sufficiency of the evidence supporting his conviction for carrying a handgun without a license as a Class A misdemeanor. 1
We affirm.
The facts in the light most favorable to the conviction reveal that on May 30, 2002, Officer Michael Watkins of the Indianapolis Police Department stopped a car for speeding. The driver of the car, later identified as Thurman, told Watkins that he did not have his driver's license with him. Watkins asked Thurman to step out of the car and told him to wait in the back of Watkins's patrol car.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Henderson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
- Moran v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1993
- Anderson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
- Klopfenstein v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1982
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Tharpe v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
- Deshazier v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
- AGS Capital Corp. v. Product Action International, LLCIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
- Garriott v. PetersIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
- Staton v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2006
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.