Staton v. State
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
BOEHM, Justice.
It is a core constitutional principle that in a criminal prosecution the State must prove every element of an offense. We hold that when the age of a defendant is an element of a crime the defendant does not waive that requirement by failing to *472file a motion to dismiss on the ground that he is not of the required age.
Facts and Procedural History
On the evening of January 18, 2004, two fifteen year old girls, M.M. and E.G., were dropped off at the swimming pool where Joshua Staton was working as a lifeguard. Both M.M. and E.G. knew Staton because his family had socialized with…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Sandstrom v. MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Mullaney v. WilburSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Insko v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2007
- Hightower v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
- C.D.H. v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
- Scott v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
- C.D.H. v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.