Legal Opinion
Feezor v. Patterson
District Court, E.D. California
Decided October 5, 2012No. Civ. No. S-10-1165 KJM GGHPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*897 ORDER
K. J. MUELLER, District Judge.
This matter is before the court on cross-motions for summary judgment brought by plaintiff Lary Feezor (“Feezor” or “plaintiff’) and defendant Eddie Bauer LLC (“Eddie Bauer”). Also before the court are the cross-motions for summary judgment brought by defendant Hanesbrands Direct, LLC (“Hanesbrands”) and plaintiff. This matter was decided without a hearing. For the following reasons, Eddie Bauer’s and Hanesbrands’ motions are hereby GRANTED.
I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Feezor is a paraplegic who uses a wheelchair; the parties agree that he falls within…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Chapman v. Pier 1 Imports (U.S.) Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Heejoon Chung v. U.S. Bank, N.A.District Court, D. Hawaii · 2017
- Durham v. National Credit Adjusters, LLCDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2025
- Jasmine Vineyards, Inc. v. D.R. Johnson Lumber Co.District Court, E.D. California · 2025