Markley v. Hudson
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.
In the trial court, the following interrogatory, among others, was submitted to the jury: “Did William T. Markley and Eleanor Hudson Markley enter into a mutual contract of present marriage accompanied and followed by cohabitation as husband and wife, they being so treated and reputed in the community and circle in which they lived?”
This interrogatory was answered in the affirmative. It follows, of course, that if there was probative evidence m the record to sustain this verdict of the jury, the Court of Appeals erred in reversing the judgment of the Probate Court and in rendering final…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- In Re Estate of RedmanOhio Supreme Court · 1939
3Cited by23 opinions
- In Re Estate of SoederOhio Court of Appeals · 1966
- Gloria YOUNG; Alicia Young; Nicholas Young, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
- Nestor v. NestorOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- Dibble v. Dibble, Admx.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1950
- In Re Allen's EstateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1959
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.