Legal Opinion

McCartney v. Campbell

California Supreme Court

Decided January 10, 1930No. Docket No. L.A. 11047PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPreston, J.

Motion to dismiss appeal. Plaintiff, as the owner of a certain tract of real property in Los Angeles County, having the same under subdivision, sued the various defendants in- an ordinary action to quiet title. Issues upon the complaint and answers thereto and upon cross-complaints by certain defendants and answers thereto were made up as was also the issue made by one complaint in intervention and answer thereto. The defendants constitute a large body of persons, some of them claiming under an agency contract executed by the plaintiff to defendant A. P. Campbell, and others claiming as…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Armstrong v. Sacramento Valley R. Co.California Supreme Court · 1919

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Greco v. Oregon Mutual Fire InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  2. Ebensteiner Co., Inc. v. Chadmar GroupCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
  3. Wood v. RoachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  4. Timm v. McCartneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  5. McLane v. StorrCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API