Legal Opinion

Birmingham Belt R. Co. v. Ellenburg

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 2, 1926No. 6 Div. 679PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBouldin, J.

Under our liberal system of pleading and practice, new counts or statements of the cause of action which could have been joined in the original complaint may be added by amendment, and relate back to the beginning of suit as affected by the statute of limitations. Code, § 9513.

In an action brought under the federal Employers’ Liability Act (U. S. Comp. St. §§ 8657-8665), is an amendment allowable presenting a case under the Workmen’s Compensation Law? We think not, for the following reasons: (1) The positive provision of Code, § 7570, that claims “shall be forever barred, * * * unless within…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Steagall v. Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1922

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Ingalls Shipbuilding Corporation v. CahelaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
  2. Union Indemnity Co. v. WebsterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  3. Sovereign Camp, W. O. W. v. CarrellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  4. SCI ALABAMA FUNERAL SERVICES v. HesterCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2007
  5. Pine, Adm'r v. DavisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API