Melchionne v. City of Newark
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion was delivered
Pee Cueiam.
The question here is whether plaintiffs have tenure under the Civil Service Act, N. J. S. A. 11:1-1 et seq., in the positions of “foreman, parks and trees.” The Department of Civil Service held they did not and hence approved their “demotion” to 'laborer-driver.” The Appellate Division reversed. 60 N. J. Super. 104 (1960). Both the Department and the City of Newark appeal, asserting the judgment violates Art. VII, § I, par. 2 of the Constitution, the provisions relating to the civil service. A motion was made to dismiss the appeals upon the ground that the…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Lhormer v. BowenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
- Palmer v. Pioneer Inn Associates, Ltd.Nevada Supreme Court · 2002
- Demoura v. City of NewarkNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1962
- Omrod v. NJ Department of Civil ServiceNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977
- Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2010
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.