Legal Opinion

Melchionne v. City of Newark

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided January 10, 1961PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion was delivered

Pee Cueiam.

The question here is whether plaintiffs have tenure under the Civil Service Act, N. J. S. A. 11:1-1 et seq., in the positions of “foreman, parks and trees.” The Department of Civil Service held they did not and hence approved their “demotion” to 'laborer-driver.” The Appellate Division reversed. 60 N. J. Super. 104 (1960). Both the Department and the City of Newark appeal, asserting the judgment violates Art. VII, § I, par. 2 of the Constitution, the provisions relating to the civil service. A motion was made to dismiss the appeals upon the ground that the…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Lhormer v. BowenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  2. Palmer v. Pioneer Inn Associates, Ltd.Nevada Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Demoura v. City of NewarkNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1962
  4. Omrod v. NJ Department of Civil ServiceNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977
  5. Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2010

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API