Legal Opinion

Southern Pacific Company v. Hendricks

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided May 27, 1959No. 6361PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

UDALL, Justice.

This is an appeal by defendant, Southern Pacific Company, a corporation, from a judgment, based upon a jury verdict, in favor of plaintiff-appellee, Clotilda A. Hendricks, administratrix of the estate of her son, Alexander Joseph Augustin, deceased, for his alleged wrongful death by sunstroke due to the claimed negligence of defendant. We shall hereafter refer to the parties by name or as plaintiff’s decedent, and defendant.

*375The action was brought under the provisions of the Federal Employers’ Liability Act, Title 45 U.S.C.A. § 51 et seq. The statute expressly imposes liability…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Cortes v. Baltimore Insular Line, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Szabo v. Pennsylvania Railroad Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1945
  3. Carey v. DavisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1921
  4. Rival v. Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Louis P. Lanni v. William Wyer, as Trustee of the Long Island Rail Road CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Lynne Stockberger, Both Personally and as the Representative of Maurice Stockberger, Deceased v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
  2. Handy v. Union Pacific RailroadCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1992
  3. Vanderbilt University v. RussellTennessee Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Bell v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
  5. Crystal Sells, as Personal, etc. v. CSX Transportation, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API