Legal Opinion

Bell v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided August 23, 1996No. A96A1115PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judge Harold R. Banke.

Federal Employers’ Liability Act. John Bell suffered heat stroke or severe heat exhaustion while working for Norfolk Southern. In this suit against his employer, he contends the railroad’s failure to promptly supply him emergency medical attention after this attack has afflicted him with a permanently disabling syndrome called “heat intolerance.” The trial court granted summary judgment based on the statute of limitation and the merits, finding Norfolk Southern produced uncontradicted evidence it exercised reasonable care in *789addressing Bell’s medical problem. Held:

1. In…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Bagley v. CSX Transportation, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1995
  2. Rival v. Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Thompson v. Hardy Chevrolet-Pontiac-Buick, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
  4. Taylor v. SchanderCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
  5. Wyse v. Potamkin Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1988

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Woods v. HallCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
  2. McClain v. GeorgeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
  3. Herrin Business Products, Inc. v. ErgleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
  4. Milestone v. DavidCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
  5. Bell v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1996

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API