Legal Opinion
Gomez v. Bobker
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 17, 1986PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In December 1981, the defendants mortgagors Mendel Bobker and Ahuva Bobker, doing business as Masada Realty Co. (hereinafter Bobker), defaulted on consolidated mortgages held by the Dime Savings Bank of Williamsburgh (hereinafter Dime) covering an apartment building located at 1958 50th Street in Brooklyn. Dime commenced the instant foreclosure action in May 1982 and assigned the mortgage, which contained a rent assignment clause, to the plaintiff Florencio Gomez (hereinafter Gomez) on November 30, 1982. On December 1, 1982, Gomez posted a notice in the premises which notified the tenants…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Sullivan v. . RossonNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
- Woodhull v. . RosenthalNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
- Dime Savings Bank of Brooklyn v. AltmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
- Herrmann v. . Cabinet Land Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Dime Savings Bank of Brooklyn v. AltmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- 641 Associates, Ltd. v. Balcor Real Estate Finance, Inc. (In Re 641 Associates, Ltd.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1992
- Chemical Bank v. Evans & Hughes Realty, L.P.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Ezriel Equities Associates L.P. v. 157 East 72nd Street AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Mardenborough v. U.S. Bank N.A.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022