DIRECTV, Inc. v. Levin
Ohio Supreme Court
1DissentBrown, C.J.
{¶ 42} Cable companies and satellite companies sell the same thing: pay-television service. But in Ohio they are not taxed the same. Satellite companies must collect the 5 1/2 percent sales tax; cable companies do not.
{¶ 43} Why the difference? When the tax bill was introduced, it imposed an equal tax regardless of seller. Cable-television lobbyists stepped in and drew the legislature’s attention to certain economic realities: the cable industry directly employs exponentially more Ohioans (6,000) than the satellite industries (a “nominal” number) and pays exponentially more taxes (over $100…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Directv, Inc. And Echostar Satellite L.L.C. v. Mark Treesh, Commissioner for the Department of Revenue for the State of KentuckyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- Maryland v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- City of Philadelphia v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Exxon Corp. v. Governor of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Oregon Waste Systems, Inc. v. Department of Environmental Quality of Ore.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.