Legal Opinion
Citibank (South Dakota), NA v. Schmidt
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided January 2, 2008No. 24389Published
1Opinion of the Court
744 N.W.2d 829 (2008)
2008 SD 1
CITIBANK SOUTH DAKOTA, N.A., Plaintiff and Appellee,
v.
Wayne E. SCHMIDT, Defendant and Appellant.
No. 24389.
Supreme Court of South Dakota.
Considered on Briefs August 27, 2007.
Decided January 2, 2008.
Robert J. Breit of Breit Law Offices; Sioux Falls, South Dakota, Attorneys for plaintiff and appellee.
Wayne E. Schmidt, Mobridge, South Dakota, Pro Se defendant and appellant.
KONENKAMP, Justice.
[¶ 1.] In this collection action, a debtor representing himself advances several dubious legal theories on why he should not be responsible for paying his entire credit card…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Wilson v. Great Northern Railway CompanySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968
- Chem-Age Industries, Inc. v. GloverSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
- State, Department of Revenue v. ThiewesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
- Bordeaux v. Shannon County SchoolsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.