Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Coleman v. City of Pittsburg

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided October 9, 1909No. 15,278PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Original proceeding for contempt.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Mason, J.:

In 1906 an action was brought in this court in the name of the state on the relation of the attorney-general against the city of Pittsburg to put an end to the unlawful practice alleged to exist there of in effect licensing the sale of intoxicating liquors, under the guise of collecting at regular intervals fines for the infraction of the prohibitory law. A commissioner' was appointed, who filed á report May 13, 1907, sustaining the allegations of the petition. A final judgment was rendered July 5, 1907, ousting the city from the exercise of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. ShippSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  2. In re ReeseCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1901
  3. State v. CutlerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1874
  4. Hamilton v. Diamond Drill & Machine Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1905
  5. State v. City of PittsburgSupreme Court of Kansas · 1907

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. Town of HudsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
  2. Koch Engineering Co. v. FaulconerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1980
  3. People v. MortensonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1922
  4. State ex rel. Jackson v. City of CoffeyvilleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913
  5. State v. FrishmanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API