Legal Opinion

State v. City of Pittsburg

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 5, 1907No. 15,278PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Original proceeding in quo warranto.

1Per curiam

This is an original action of quo warranto, brought by the state on the relation of the attorney-general to oust the city of Pittsburg from the exercise of certain assumed and unwarranted corporate powers, namely, the imposition and collection of a license tax upon the business of selling and keeping for sale intoxicating liquors in a manner forbidden by law, and also authorizing and licensing bawdy-houses and houses of ill fame and the collection of money from the keepers and inmates of these places for the privilege of carrying on the illicit business. It was alleged that the city officers…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. State ex rel. Coleman v. City of PittsburgSupreme Court of Kansas · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API