Legal Opinion

In the Interest of Spause

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 27, 1989No. Nos. 776 and 777PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CIRILLO, President Judge:

This is an interlocutory appeal taken by Matthew Spause, a juvenile, following the denial of his motion to dismiss the prosecution of two juvenile delinquency petitions, involving rape of his four-year old niece and escape from a shelter in which he had been placed pending the proceedings on the *168rape petition. Spause’s motion to dismiss was based upon double jeopardy grounds.

On September 26, 1987, the Commonwealth filed a juvenile petition seeking adjudication for rape, involuntary deviate sexual intercourse, indecent assault, indécent exposure, simple assault,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. TarverSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  2. Commonwealth v. BradySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  3. Commonwealth v. LudwigSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. In Interest of LeonardoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  5. In Re Interest of DreslinskiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BakerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  2. Commonwealth v. BakerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API