Commonwealth v. Baker
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partNix, Chief Justice
I continue to possess the view that juvenile adjudications should not be used for establishing aggravating circumstances to justify the death sentence. I therefore dissent from the majority opinion that a history of juvenile adjudications may be used as an aggravating circumstance under the Death *571Penalty Statute. I concur, however, in the Court’s affirmance of a finding of murder in the first degree.
Juvenile adjudications do not operate within the same constitutional bounds as criminal proceedings at the adult level. There is no right to a jury trial in juvenile proceedings. In re Terry, 438…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- McKeiver v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Commonwealth v. KrumSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Terry AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
- Commonwealth v. PetrilloSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Hendrickson v. MyersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.