Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Commonwealth v. Baker

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 17, 1992No. 23 E.D. Docket 1985Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partNix, Chief Justice

I continue to possess the view that juvenile adjudications should not be used for establishing aggravating circumstances to justify the death sentence. I therefore dissent from the majority opinion that a history of juvenile adjudications may be used as an aggravating circumstance under the Death *571Penalty Statute. I concur, however, in the Court’s affirmance of a finding of murder in the first degree.

Juvenile adjudications do not operate within the same constitutional bounds as criminal proceedings at the adult level. There is no right to a jury trial in juvenile proceedings. In re Terry, 438…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. McKeiver v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Commonwealth v. KrumSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. Terry AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  4. Commonwealth v. PetrilloSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  5. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Hendrickson v. MyersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API