Legal Opinion · Dissent

Rhiel v. Adams (In Re Adams)

Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit

Decided December 10, 2003No. 03-8011Published

1Dissent

LATTA, Bankruptcy Judge,

dissenting.

I agree with the majority that the Debtors have failed to prove that their pension plans constitute trusts. In fact, I would put the matter more strongly the Debtors’ pension plans manifestly are not trusts. Because I do not believe, however, that the presence of an express trust is required to exclude an ERISA-qualified retirement plan from the assets of a bankruptcy estate, I respectfully dissent from the opinion of the majority.

With respect to statutory construction, the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals has instructed:

‘We read statutes and regulations with…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Morton v. MancariSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Patterson v. ShumateSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Guidry v. Sheet Metal Workers National Pension FundSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Walker v. BainCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
  5. In Re BarnesUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 2001

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API