Rhiel v. Adams (In Re Adams)
Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit
1Dissent
LATTA, Bankruptcy Judge,
dissenting.
I agree with the majority that the Debtors have failed to prove that their pension plans constitute trusts. In fact, I would put the matter more strongly the Debtors’ pension plans manifestly are not trusts. Because I do not believe, however, that the presence of an express trust is required to exclude an ERISA-qualified retirement plan from the assets of a bankruptcy estate, I respectfully dissent from the opinion of the majority.
With respect to statutory construction, the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals has instructed:
‘We read statutes and regulations with…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Morton v. MancariSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Patterson v. ShumateSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Guidry v. Sheet Metal Workers National Pension FundSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Walker v. BainCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
- In Re BarnesUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 2001
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.