Legal Opinion

Tac-Critical Systems, Inc. v. Integrated Facility Systems, Inc.

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided September 2, 2011No. Civil Action No. 2009-1512PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

JAMES E. BOASBERG, District Judge.

Plaintiff TAC-Critical Systems, Inc. has brought this diversity action for breach of contract against Defendants Integrated Facility Systems, Inc. and its sole owner and officer, Mohan Jacob. IFS is now a defunct company that closed its doors in 2009. To recover the $239,666.04 in damages it seeks on its breach-of-contract claim, Plaintiff asserts a veil-piercing theory to hold Jacob personally liable for IFS’s corporate debts. Jacob now moves for summary judgment, arguing that, even if IFS did breach the contract, TAC cannot, as a…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. Holcomb, Christine v. Powell, DonaldCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2006

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Pertuis v. Front Roe Restaurants, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2018
  2. Partridge v. Am. Hosp. Mgmt. Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
  3. Pister v. State, Department of RevenueAlaska Supreme Court · 2015
  4. United States v. EmorDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
  5. Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. WrightDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API