Seixas v. Hegeman
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRosenman, J.
Motion for summary judgment is granted. The guaranty was not intended to terminate until bona fide leases of the annual face amount of $215,000 had been secured, eighty per cent of which (in amount) were not to expire before May 1, 1931. The bondholders were to have the protection of the guaranty until *561they could be sure that $215,000 in rentals would be received each year, and that eighty per cent of that amount at least was to continue after May 1, 1931. This amount was fixed at a definite figure, to be stipulated in bona fide leases. It was not contemplated that the amount was to remain…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Klinke v. SamuelsNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
3Cited by7 opinions
- Union Trust Co. v. WillseaNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
- Sasso v. Millbrook Enterprises, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1981
- Courtney v. Brooklyn & Queens Allied Oil Burner Corp.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1981
- Winter v. TrepteWisconsin Supreme Court · 1940
- Herman v. MuellerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1942
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.