Legal Opinion

Seixas v. Hegeman

New York Supreme Court

Decided September 24, 1935PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRosenman, J.

Motion for summary judgment is granted. The guaranty was not intended to terminate until bona fide leases of the annual face amount of $215,000 had been secured, eighty per cent of which (in amount) were not to expire before May 1, 1931. The bondholders were to have the protection of the guaranty until *561they could be sure that $215,000 in rentals would be received each year, and that eighty per cent of that amount at least was to continue after May 1, 1931. This amount was fixed at a definite figure, to be stipulated in bona fide leases. It was not contemplated that the amount was to remain…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Klinke v. SamuelsNew York Court of Appeals · 1934

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Union Trust Co. v. WillseaNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
  2. Sasso v. Millbrook Enterprises, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Courtney v. Brooklyn & Queens Allied Oil Burner Corp.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1981
  4. Winter v. TrepteWisconsin Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Herman v. MuellerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1942

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API