Investment Co. v. Hambach
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for "King county, Kudkin, J., entered May 12, 1904, in favor of the plaintiff, as prayed, upon sustaining a demurrer to an answer in an action of ejectment.
1Opinion of the CourtHadley, J.
This is an action in ejectment, brought to. recover possession of a portion of lot 19, block 329, as shown upon the plat of the Seattle tide lands. The portion sought to he recovered lies along the northerly side of the lot. The defendants, answered, admitting that the plaintiff is the owner of the whole of the lot. They affirmatively averred that, since about January 1, 1900, the defendants Hambach and wife have been the owners of lot 18, in the above mentioned block, which adjoins said lot 19 upon the northerly side of the latter; that about said date they employed a competent civil…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Green v. BiddleSupreme Court of the United States · 1823
- Billings v. HallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1857
- Wilson v. Red Wing School DistrictSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1876
- Boyce v. HolmesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1841
- Flynn v. LemieuxSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
3Cited by4 opinions
- Gould v. WhiteWashington Supreme Court · 1909
- Monk v. DuellWashington Supreme Court · 1906
- Northwestern Industries, Inc. v. City of SeattleCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1983
- Barton v. WickizerWashington Supreme Court · 1906