Legal Opinion
Miller v. State
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided September 25, 1970No. 500PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
OMAN, Judge.
Defendant appeals from the order denying his motion filed pursuant to Rule 93 [§ 21-1-1(93), N.M.S.A.1953 (Supp.1969)]. His conviction of possession of marijuana has heretofore been affirmed by this court. State v. Miller, 80 N.M. 227, 453 P.2d 590 (Ct.App.1969), cert. denied, 80 N.M. 198, 453 P.2d 219 (1969).
He relies upon two points for reversal, the first of which is: “THE TRIAL COURT ERRED IN ADMITTING INTO EVIDENCE HEARSAY TESTIMONY BY OFFICER ARTHUR SEDILLO THAT DEFENDANT WAS ENGAGED IN ILLEGAL MARIJUANA TRAFFIC.”
The testimony referred to is the testimony of Officer…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- State v. AlbertsNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1969
- State v. MillerNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1969
- Wynne v. PinoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
- State v. GarciaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1969
- Smith v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1968
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Smith v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1971
- State v. BeachumNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1972
- Woods v. StateNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1972
- State v. PadillaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1973
- Andrada v. StateNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1971
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.