Legal Opinion
Boise Cascade Corporation v. Union Pacific Railroad Company San Pedro, Los Angeles and Salt Lake Railroad Company and the United States of America
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided September 22, 1980No. 78-1462PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BREITENSTEIN, Circuit Judge.
This quiet title dispute presents conflicting claims to a strip of land in Utah claimed by Railroads under a federal right-of-way grant and by a lumber company under mesne conveyances from the State of Utah. The United States is joined because of a possible reversionary interest. The district court granted summary judgment for the defendants. See Boise Cascade Corp. v. Union Pacific R.R. Co., D. Utah, 454 F.Supp. 531. We affirm.
The land is in Section 16, T. 6 South, R. 2 East, Utah County, Utah. Plaintiff-appellant Boise Cascade is the successor in interest of the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Shively v. BowlbySupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Great Northern Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. TownsendSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Packer v. BirdSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Northern Pacific Railroad v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- B & S Holdings, LLC v. BNSF Railway Co.District Court, E.D. Washington · 2012
- Home on the Range v. AT & T Corp.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 2005
- Puett v. Western Pacific RailroadNevada Supreme Court · 1988
- Calhan Chamber of Commerce v. Town of CalhanColorado Court of Appeals · 2007
- Cupps v. Pioneer Canal-LakeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2020