Barlow v. Rushin
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Nichols, Presiding Judge.
1. “Errors alleged to have been in the charge, but to which there was no exception as provided in Code Ann. § 70-207 (a, b), will not generally be held harmful as a matter of law, and will not be considered unless it appears that a gross injustice is about to result or has resulted, directly attributable to the alleged errors.” Nathan v. Dun can, 113 Ga. App. 630 (6) (149 SE2d 383); Georgia Power Co. v. Maddox, 113 Ga. App. 642 (149 SE2d 393); Southern R. Co. v. Grogan, 113 Ga. App. 451, 458 (148 SE2d 439).
2. All of the enumerations of error in the main appeal address…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Nathan v. DuncanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
- Georgia Power Co. v. MaddoxCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
- Southern Railway Co. v. GroganCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
3Cited by11 opinions
- Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. LutherCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
- Hogan v. OliveraCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
- Reeves v. MorganCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
- Foskey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
- Stubbs v. Greyhound Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.