United States v. Aultman Co.
District Court, N.D. Ohio
At Law. The plaintiff and defendant having rested, the testimony being all before the court, counsel for the defendant moved the court for a nonsuit, and that the court direct the jury to return a verdict for the defendant.
1Opinion of the CourtTayler, District Judge
(orally). This action is based on sections 4 and 5 of the act to regulate the immigration of aliens into the United States. Act March 3, 1903, c. 1012, 32 Stat. 1214 [U. S. Comp. St. Supp. 1905, p. 277]. The claim is that the defendant, in violation of that law, solicited and procured the importation of one Hermann, an alien, from Canada. Since the observation of the district attorney as to changes in the law since its original passage, or since the time when the decisions referred to were rendered, I have looked at the statute with a view of finding out what changes were made as respects the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Church of the Holy Trinity v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Kohen v. Mutual Reserve Fund Life Ass'nU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri · 1886
- In re PanzaraDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1892
- Moffitt v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1904
- In re MaiolaU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1895
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Frick v. LewisCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1912
- United States v. NakashimaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1908
- Ex parte HoffmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1910
- Ex parte PettersonDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1908
- United States v. SprungCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1910
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.