Legal Opinion

In re Panzara

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided June 1, 1892PublishedCited by 14 opinions

At Law. Application of Angelo Lanzara and others l'or a writ of habeas corpus.

1Opinion of the Court

Benedict, District Judge.

The petitioners, six in number, joined in a petition for a writ of habeas corpus addressed to the master of the ship Cheribon, in order that the legality of their detention by that master might be inquired into by this court. The master produced the petitioners in accordance with the writ, and made return that “the above-named persons had been placed in his custody as master of said steam*276ship, and on hoard thereof, by the direction of the superintendent of immigration of the port of New York, to be sent back to Italy.” To this return the petitioners made answer that…

2Cited by14 opinions

  1. Rodgers v. United States ex rel. BuchsbaumCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1907
  2. United States v. NakashimaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1908
  3. In re MartorelliU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1894
  4. United States v. Aultman Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1906
  5. Ex parte PettersonDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1908

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API