Legal Opinion

C. S. Emery & Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided April 24, 1968No. C.D. 3426PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Landis, Judge:

The relatively broad issue in this protest is whether entry merchandise described as “Asphalt Saturated Asbestos Felt Perforated” should be classified as an article of asbestos, not specially provided for, dutiable at 9 per centum ad valorem, under TSUS item 518.51, as it was in liquidation, or, more properly, as building paper or building paper-felt, dutiable at 5 per centum ad valorem under TSUS item 251.05, as plaintiff claims. If the merchandise is both, that is, an article of asbestos and building paper or felt, then it will be classified as building paper or felt which is…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Floral Arts Studios v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1962
  2. Tower v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1947

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Richard Nelson Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API