Legal Opinion

State v. Spayde

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 13, 1899PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from Webster District Court.—Hon. B. P. Bird-sale, Judge. Indictment for forgery. Prom a verdict and judgment of guilty, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtDeemer, J.

Defendant was first indicted by the grand jury of Humboldt county. A trial was commenced, a jury impaneled and sworn, the evidence of the state • adduced, and the defendant had testified) in his own behalf, that he had affixed the signature to the note which It is claimed was forged in Webster county. Thereupon the court trying the case ordered the jury discharged, and held the defendant to bail to answer to a warrant from Webster county. This action of the court was objected to by the defendant, who insisted that, as there was evidence tending to show that the crime was committed in Humboldt…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. CallendineSupreme Court of Iowa · 1859
  2. Ex parte BaldwinSupreme Court of Iowa · 1886
  3. Carter v. BarlowSupreme Court of Iowa · 1898
  4. State v. ClarkSupreme Court of Iowa · 1886

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Hill v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1972
  2. State v. AsheWashington Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Robinson v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1926
  4. State v. GibsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1940
  5. State v. SchwendermanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1921

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API