Weisinger v. Berfond
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtM. Henry Martuscello, J.
Plaintiff moves to strike out defendants’ notice of examination or, in the alternative, deferring examination until after plaintiff’s examination of defendants. Defendants cross-move to vacate plaintiff’s notice of examination on the ground that defendants are entitled to priority in the examination and on the further ground that insufficient notice of the examination was given.
The action is predicated upon an alleged joint venture between plaintiff and the defendants Berfond and Bae to impress a trust upon real estate owned by the defendants or some of them and for an accounting. The answer…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Valz v. Sheepshead Bay Bungalow Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Desiderio v. GabrielliAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954
- Tollis v. New York, Hew Haven & Hartford RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953
- Isenburger v. Arrowhead Mills, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925
- Schatzkin v. SchatzkinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1951
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Preferred Electric & Wire Corp. v. PriceNew York Supreme Court · 1971
- Klevens Construction Co. v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1976