Legal Opinion

Klevens Construction Co. v. State

New York Court of Claims

Decided May 12, 1976No. Claim No. 60032Published

1Opinion of the CourtFrank S. Rossetti, J.

Defendant does not contest claimant’s entitlement to the examination sought herein, but requests such examination be conditioned on defendant having its examination of claimant first.

The normal procedure for obtaining disclosure is for either party to merely serve a notice therefor on their adversary (see CPLR 3102, subd [b]; CPLR 3107). The only statute dealing with priority of examinations is CPLR 3106 (subd [a]), which requires a plaintiff to obtain leave of court, on motion, if he desires to serve a notice of examination within 20 days after service of the complaint. The rationale for…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Punia v. Dry Dock Savings BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952
  2. Seifert v. McLaughlinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1961
  3. Bingham v. Wells, Rich, Greene, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1970
  4. Rodriguez v. Manhattan & Bronx Surface Transit Operating AuthorityNew York Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Fund of Funds, Ltd. v. Waddell & Reed, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1966

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API