Legal Opinion

Scorsoni v. Pittsburgh Provision & Packing Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 3, 1922No. Appeal, No. 131PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal, No. 131, Oct. T., 1921, by defendant, from judgment of C. P. Allegheny Co., Jan. T., 1920, No. 1401, on verdict for plaintiff, in case of Louisa Scorsoni v. Pittsburgh Provision & Packing Co. Trespass for death of plaintiff’s husband. The opinion of the Supreme Court states the facts. Verdict and judgment for plaintiff for $2,760. Defendant appealed. Error assigned, inter alia, was refusal of judgment for defendant n. o. v., quoting record.

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

Plaintiff’s husband, while riding on the Lincoln Highway near the City of Pittsburgh on a truck operated by their minor son, an employee of Jordan Brothers, was injured as a result of a collision with a truck of defendant’s, and died a few hours later. The evidence as to the cause of the collision was conflicting, each driver claiming the accident was the result of negligence on the part of the other. At the conclusion of the testimony defendant asked for binding instructions in its favor, assigning, as a reason in support of the motion, that deceased himself was chargeable with…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. McIlhenny v. BakerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1916

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Western & Atlantic Railroad v. ReedCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1926
  2. Laubach v. ColleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  3. Salvitti v. ThroppeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  4. Purol, Inc. v. Great Eastern System, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  5. Dolan v. BurkeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1926

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API