Legal Opinion
Donald E. FIEDLER, Appellant, v. INDIANHEAD TRUCK LINE, INC., Appellee
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided February 22, 1982No. 81-1590PublishedCited by 81 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LAY, Chief Judge.
Fiedler seeks reinstatement and money damages under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act for an allegedly unlawful discharge. He appeals from the district court’s grant of summary judgment finding Fiedler’s failure to accept Indianhead’s offer of reinstatement was an unreasonable refusal to mitigate all damages that eliminated his entire claim. He also contends the district court erred in ruling that damages for pain and suffering are not recoverable under the Act. We remand the issue relating to the defendant’s liability on his accrued damages; we otherwise affirm the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Lorillard v. PonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Henry Carl DEAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. AMERICAN SECURITY INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
- EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. SANDIA CORPORATION, a Corp., Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
- Rogers v. Exxon Research & Engineering Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Wehr v. Burroughs Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by81 opinions
- Commissioner v. SchleierSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Haskell v. Kaman Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- Addie JOHNSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. AL TECH SPECIALTIES STEEL CORP., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- Walker v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
- Andrew W. Hansard, Cross-Appellant v. Pepsi-Cola Metropolitan Bottling Co., Inc., D/B/A Pepsi-Cola Bottling Group, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.