Legal Opinion

State v. Crockett

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided September 6, 2001No. 00-3053PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDykman, J.

¶ 1. Andre D. Crockett appeals from an order denying his motion for postconviction relief under Wis. Stat. § 974.06 (1997-98), 1 or in the alternative, for resentencing or sentence modification under the court's inherent authority. Although Crockett provides no sufficient reason for failing to assert the due process claim in one of his previous postconviction motions, he contends that the claim is not waived because the State failed to argue waiver in the trial court. We conclude that the State's failure to argue waiver does not prohibit this court from considering it on appeal and that State…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. McCleskey v. ZantSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. State v. Escalona-NaranjoWisconsin Supreme Court · 1994
  3. State v. EricksonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1999
  4. State v. LechnerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1998
  5. State v. FranklinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1989

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. HarborWisconsin Supreme Court · 2011
  2. State v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2009
  3. State v. TillmanCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2005
  4. State v. BarbeauCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2016
  5. Davis v. MeisnerDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2023

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API