Legal Opinion

Bloomsburg Bank Columbia Trust Co. v. Mensch

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Northumberland County

Decided May 3, 1990No. CV-89-740Published

1Opinion of the Court

RANCK, P.J.,

Before this court are defendants’ preliminary objections to late charges in plaintiffs’ complaint in this mortgage *657foreclosure case. Pa.R.C.P. 1141 and 1146 dictate that an in rem action on the mortgage cannot be brought in conjunction with the action in personam on the note; thus, the late charges must be stricken from the complaint. These charges may be recovered in a later action on the note.

The plaintiffs, mortgagees, filed a complaint in mortgage foreclosure against the defendants, mortgagors, on May 8, 1989. Preliminary objections were filed on June 21, 1989, and the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. MECO REALTY CO. v. BurnsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  2. Insilco Corp. v. RayburnSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  3. Signal Consumer Discount Co. v. BabuscioSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  4. Kretschman v. StollSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  5. In re Estate of EvanovichSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API