Legal Opinion

Inskeep v. Gilbert

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 29, 1910No. 21,791PublishedCited by 4 opinions

From Wells Circuit Court; Charles E. Sturgis, Judge. Drainage petition by Philip H. Gilbert and others, against which Sarah E. Inskeep and others remonstrate. From a judgment for petitioners, remonstrants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtMonks, J.

This proceeding was brought by appellees before the Board of Commissioners of the County of Wells, under section nineteen of the drainage act of 1907 (Acts 1907 p. 508, §6174 Burns 1908), for the tiling of an open public drain. At the proper time each of the appellants filed a separate remonstrance, and the cause was tried by said board of commissioners, and judgment rendered confirming the report and establishing said proposed work. Appellants appealed from said judgment to the court below, where the cause was again tried, and the court found in favor of appellees, and over the separate…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Gates v. Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Migatz v. StieglitzIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Hall v. McDonaldIndiana Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Lynch v. Milwaukee Harvester Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Rosenzweig v. FrazerIndiana Supreme Court · 1881

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Adkins v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Holtzman v. SmithIndiana Court of Appeals · 1919
  3. Adkins v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Flack v. Big Cedar Grove Cemetery AssociationIndiana Court of Appeals · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API